This Sigma lens, which I have had since November 2008 has been great from the very beginning. I paid around $370 for the lens, compared to over $600 for the equivalent Canon lens. Even though price was a consideration when buying this lens, I first looked up different lens reviews in magazine and at internet sites. Most of the reviews concluded that the Sigma lens was, for the most part, equivalent, or even better than the Canon lens. I photograph portraits and weddings all year long and I have always been very satisfied with the sharpness and the color hues in this lens. Many people believe that a brand name lens (Canon, Nikon) is always better and more rugged than an independent brand. Judging from my experience with this brand, SIGMA lenses (I have three Sigmas) have always been of top quality.
Help answer the question about Lens Beautiful
I recently purchased a Nikon d300. I enjoy taking portraits. What lens should I buy on a tight budget?
I have Lens Beautiful a 55-200, a 35-70, and a 50 mm lens.I want to take beautiful portraits as well as do some location shooting of bathing beauties and so on. I have about $500.00 and I want a lens that is going to produce sharp images.
Holder Adapter Information Blog
I have reviewed Fld Nikon to help you make a smart decision
High Quality Free Helpful Roadmap
Tulip Shape Free helpful Information
Filter Boxed Advice Blog
Tele Telephoto Free Related Knowledgebase
Panasonic Dmc Free Important Guide
Lenscoat Hoodie Resource
Plastic Case Free Significant Tip
Great Tamron Sigma Info
